VISTA (CNS) – A murder conviction was reversed Friday for a 73-year-old former Valley Center resident, who was convicted in 2001 of killing her husband and was serving a 25-years-to-life sentence, but may receive a new trial due to newly discovered DNA evidence.
Jane Dorotik was found guilty of the murder of 55-year-old Robert Dorotik, whose body was found on Feb. 13, 2000, one day after his wife said he disappeared after going jogging, prompting her to report him missing.
Dorotik was released from the California Institution for Women in Corona in April amid the COVID-19 pandemic and will remain out of custody on her own recognizance. Attorneys will reconvene Oct. 25 to discuss the possibility of a retrial.
“After fighting for nearly 20 years to overturn my conviction, I am so grateful to finally see this day,” Dorotik said in a statement released by her attorneys.
“Frankly, I’m a little overwhelmed at the moment,” she said. “I have maintained from day one that I had nothing to do with my husband’s murder. Spending almost two decades in prison falsely convicted of killing the man I loved has been incredibly painful. I lost literally everything in my life that Bob and I had built together.”
Prosecutors alleged at trial that Dorotik beat her husband to death in their bedroom in the Valley Center horse ranch they rented, then dumped his body on the side of a road a few miles away.
Medical examiners concluded he died of blunt force trauma to the head and strangulation, which prosecutors alleged was committed with a hammer and rope.
The prosecution theory was that Dorotik killed her husband because she would have to pay him 40% of her income in the event of a divorce.
Attorneys from Loyola Law School’s Project for the Innocent say Dorotik was wrongfully convicted and submitted a habeas corpus petition alleging issues with the DNA evidence and testimony used to convict her.
Her attorneys say newly conducted DNA testing of the victim’s clothing, fingernails and a rope alleged to be one of the murder weapons showed no evidence of Dorotik’s DNA, excluding her presence from the crime scene.
They also alleged a prosecution expert witness testified during Dorotik’s trial that stains found in the bedroom were her husband’s blood, even though most of the stains were not tested and never confirmed to be blood at all.
District Attorney’s Office spokesman Steve Walker said “newly discovered DNA evidence developed from advanced technology unavailable at the time of the 2001 jury trial” led the D.A.’s office to concede Dorotik’s petition, thus reversing the conviction.
During an afternoon hearing at the Vista courthouse, Deputy District Attorney Karl Husoe said some of the new evidence stems from “the results of the retesting of some physical items of evidence” and noted “the DNA evidence as it exists now in 2020 is much different in quality and quantity than presented at trial in 2001.”
The prosecutor said the new evidence “undermines the previous evidence presented at trial to the extent that a new trial would be granted by this court.”
Additionally, Husoe said the D.A.’s office received “new information regarding lab personnel which our office was previously unaware of, but (was) recently made known to us,” but did not elaborate on the content of that information.
Walker said, “Ultimately, this office intends to pursue DNA testing and retesting of the available evidence in this case using modern and advanced DNA technology available to us today. Whatever the outcome of this additional testing may be, this office will commit resources to this matter in an effort to do all we can to seek the truth and pursue justice.”