Gas tax repeal campaign claims Caltrans lobbied against them

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SAN DIEGO -- Supporters of the initiative to repeal California's gas tax are calling for an investigation into whether Caltrans workers openly campaigned against the repeal.

The Yes on 6 campaign announced they've filed an ethics complaint with the San Diego County District Attorney's Office, the California Highway Patrol and the California Fair Political Practices Commission.

The complaint claims that people in Caltrans uniforms were documented handing out "No on 6" flyers to drivers along State Highway 78.

"In my 25 years of political involvement I never thought I would have to do a press conference like the one I just did showing evidence of a state government agency wantonly using taxpayer funds to advance a position on a ballot measure,"  former Councilman Carl DeMaio, a leader of the repeal effort, said Wednesday.

Caltrans Director Laurie Berman said the agency is looking into the workers' actions.

"It is our understanding that these individuals were private contractors, not Caltrans employees," Berman said in a statement. "Regardless, the department does not condone political advocacy or the distribution of campaign information on work project sites and is contacting its contractors to remind them of this."

The No on 6 campaign issued a statement denying any knowledge of the flyer distribution and denouncing "any inappropriate use of public resources or venues for campaign purposes."

'Yes on 6' supporters say this image and other video evidence proves people in Caltrans uniforms were handing out "No on 6" flyers to drivers along State Highway 78.

Caltrans contracted Manhole Adjusting Inc. for state-funded work on Route 78 between Julian and Ramona, according to both the agency and the Yes on 6 campaign. From 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. on Tuesday, the workers, supervised by a Caltrans employee, slowed traffic to a stop, according to the campaign and an eyewitness account, to distribute flyers that read "Stop the Attack on Bridge & Road Safety."

The Yes on 6 campaign alleges the distribution broke a state law prohibiting state and local employees from using public resources for campaign activity and that stopping traffic broke a state law prohibiting the impediment of "normal and reasonable movement" unless it is necessary to do so.

Yes on 6 also alleges the No on 6 campaign violated the state Political Reform Act by providing campaign materials to publicly-funded workers and by failing to disclose the value of the "contribution" made by campaigning.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.