City votes to spend $11M on motel for the homeless

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SAN DIEGO - The San Diego City Council Monday approved an $11 million plan to purchase a motel in Nestor, which will possibly be converted into transitional housing for ex-convicts who committed low-level crimes.

Under the plan, which drew extensive community opposition and was approved on an 8-1 vote, the city will buy the 61-room Super 8 Motel at 1788 Palm Ave., and remodel the building into a 42-unit, 70-bed residential facility. Barring any delays, renovations would begin in January and the facility would open in about six months, according to city staff.

City Attorney Mara Elliott said the number of misdemeanor drug and theft cases has about tripled since the 2014 passage of state Proposition 47, which decriminalized certain types of offenses. As a result, hundreds of people are cycling through the criminal justice system, she said.

"Many are older and have had drug problems for decades," Elliott said. "They are among the most vulnerable to crime and exploitation."

She said such people will get "a fighting chance" at the facility, which will house the San Diego Misdemeanants At-Risk Track program, known as SMART.

City staff said a 10-bed SMART pilot program has proven successful, and they want to expand it citywide. Staff said the hotel property proved to be the most viable location in the city to start.

Opponents said the proposal was another example of the South Bay being dumped on by the rest of the city, and would hinder a program to revitalize the Palm Avenue corridor.

Councilman David Alvarez, who represents the area and cast the dissenting vote, said he was convinced that the project would face delays down the road, and pointed to a letter from the California Coastal Commission expressing various concerns.

"The city chose to disrespect the community, and not follow the law and is therefore in the worst possible situation -- spending millions of dollars on a property and facility that may be left vacant for years," Alvarez said. "I don't know if this will actually ever happen."

Many residents where the motel is located said the pending purchase is a waste of money and will only bring more crime and vagrancy to the area.

"The city is a large community, why is it that it's always South County that has to have these things, other places need to take their turn," said South Bay resident Grace Kojima.

Residents like Kojima are also upset with the city's "lack of notice and information" about the motel and its potential future use.

"The clarity, the transparency, giving us the opportunity for feedback for our opinions, that's the disappointing part," said Melanie Ellsworth.

City staff said the Coastal Commission won't have jurisdiction on the project, since it will have a less-intensive use than the hotel. The state agency has been concerned about a lack of low-cost lodging near California's coastal areas, but city staff said less than 20-percent of Super 8 guests are tourists visiting local beaches.

The city has yet to officially decide what to do with the motel once the purchase is final.