City council working to fund infrastructure back-log

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
pothole

SAN DIEGO — The City Council will consider Tuesday afternoon whether to have the City Attorney’s Office develop language for a proposed ballot measure that would set up a method for funding infrastructure projects in San Diego over the next three decades.

Councilman Mark Kersey’s “Rebuild San Diego” plan would amend the City Charter to dedicate future sales tax growth and money from reduced pension payments toward neighborhood upgrades, including streets, sidewalks, storm drains, parks, libraries, recreation centers, and police and fire stations.

In addition, it would preserve half of all new major general fund growth over the next five years for infrastructure projects — formalizing a commitment made by Mayor Faulconer in his first two budgets.

“The Rebuild San Diego measure is about our city budget reflecting the priorities of our citizens,” said Kersey, who chairs the City Council’s Infrastructure Committee. “Infrastructure is a core responsibility of our government. The city needs to show it has skin in the game by demonstrating its long-term commitment to investing in neighborhood improvements.”

The plan doesn’t include a tax increase — so if it goes on an election ballot, it would require only a simple majority to pass.

Faulconer has endorsed Kersey’s plan, which has also received conditional support from the city’s Independent Budget Analyst and San Diego County Taxpayers Association. Both the IBA and SDCTA have suggested tweaks.

On Monday, Councilman David Alvarez proposed an alternative plan that he said would raise $800 million over the next 10 years with a combination of higher property tax revenues from new projects, debt service savings and use of general fund savings.

Alvarez said his plan would help neighborhoods get needed upgrades faster and reduce the city’s long-term debt. He said he would ask for his idea and others from the public go before the Infrastructure Committee before the council takes action on Kersey’s plan.

The City Council isn’t scheduled to decide whether to place the Rebuild San Diego proposal on the ballot until a future meeting.

4 comments

  • MORE WASTE~!

    The Mayor and the City Council really need to put restrictions on how this infrastructure money is spent! Without restrictions you are giving departments money without rules against wasting it on plush offices, pet projects, wealthy neighborhood hookups, private construction contractor hookup to expedite private projects, etc. The money needs to be tagged specifically for laying asphalt, pipe, concrete, etc. No plush city inspection vehicles, No plush offices, no office improvements, no city parking lots, no more ridiculous bike lanes. Need extreme oversight and open reporting on how and why money is spent for every project! Not like the police cameras where we were promised one thing and not provided the openness we were promised

  • KellyEAndrews

    >>-$–G­­o­­­o­­­g­­l­­e­­­ i­­s­­ <­­-p­­a­­y­­i­­n­­g­­ 9­­7­­$ p­­e­­r h­­o­­u­­r! ­­W­­o­­r­­k ­­f­­­­o­­r ­­f­­­­e­­­­w­­ h­­­­o­­u­­r­­s ­­a­­n­­d h­­a­­v­­e l­­o­­n­­g­­e­­r w­­i­­t­­h­­ f­­­­r­­i­­e­­n­­d­­s & ­­f­­a­­m­­i­­l­­y­­! ­­O­­n ­­t­­u­­e­­s­­d­­a­­y I g­­o­­t ­­a­­ g­­r­­e­­a­­t ­­n­­e­­w­­ L­­a­­n­­d­­ R­­o­­v­­e­­r ­­R­­a­­n­­g­­e ­­R­­o­­v­­e­­r­­ f­­r­­o­­m h­­a­­v­­i­­n­­g e­­a­­r­­n­­e­­d­­ $­­8­­7­­2 t­­h­­i­­s ­­l­­a­­s­­t­­ f­­o­­u­­r­­ w­­e­­­­e­­k­­s.­­.­­ I­­t­­ s­­o­­u­­n­­d­­s­­ u­­n­­b­­e­­l­­i­­e­­v­­a­­b­­l­­e­­ b­­u­­t ­­y­­o­­u w­­o­­n­­t f­­o­­r­­g­­i­­v­­e ­­y­­o­­u­­r­­s­­e­­l­­f i­­f ­­y­­o­­u ­­d­­o­­n­­’­­t­­ c­­h­­e­­c­­k i­­t­­….
    ➤➤➤➤➤➤ Click.Here.To.Read.Full.Detail..

Comments are closed.