Watch Live: Fierce impeachment debate in House Judiciary Committee

City Council revisits 2011 marijuana dispensary ordinance

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SAN DIEGO — The City Council Monday asked the City Attorney’s Office to draft regulations for medical marijuana dispensaries that would be similar to an ordinance rescinded two years ago.

Councilwoman Marti Emerald proposed that the 2011 law be used as a template, with some revisions and redefinitions of various issues.

Pot–WehoMedical marijuana advocates considered the original ordinance to be too strict, and collected enough signatures to get it overturned.

Emerald, a strong supporter of “compassionate use” of marijuana, said constituents in the new Ninth District she represents are against the addition of more storefront dispensaries.

“Because there are so many kids in the community, and we are struggling with drug and alcohol abuse, gangs and crime — and we want to protect our kids,” Emerald said.

Emerald said she would take “a conservative approach” of where those establishments should be located.

The City Council’s direction would allow far fewer dispensaries than would have been allowed by Mayor Bob Filner.

The 2011 law only allowed dispensaries in industrial, and a few commercial zones. Filner wanted them allowed in all commercial zones, too.

Emerald also asked for buffer zones between dispensaries and sensitive land uses like schools to be extended from Filner’s proposal of 600 feet to 1,000 feet.

Filner’s plan to place a 2 percent excise tax on wholesale purchases by dispensaries failed to garner support among the council members.

However, City Attorney Jan Goldsmith said his staff would study a range of options for the city to recover its regulatory costs. Goldsmith said when he returns with a proposed ordinance, he would provide a series of policy options for the council to decide.

Council members suggested Goldsmith also look into Filner’s proposal to ban marijuana vending machines, and to possibly place a cap on the number of dispensaries that could be located in a given area.

While the council voted unanimously to provide the direction to Goldsmith, they did not give him a deadline.

Returning dispensaries to legal status has been a major priority for Filner since he took office in December.

Filner said his proposals offered a “balance” between providing “humanitarian access” and protecting the public.

“So on the one hand, we would like to provide access,” Filner said. “On the other hand, we don’t want to impose on neighborhoods and we certainly don’t want to endanger our children.”

In January, Filner, City Council and Goldsmith agreed to continue enforcing zoning violations by medical marijuana dispensaries while an ordinance is developed.

In a memo, Goldsmith said the Neighborhood Code Compliance Department has not referred any cases to his office since the agreement was reached. During that time, at least 20 dispensaries have opened illegally, he said.

Emerald asked the mayor’s office to order the new dispensaries to close until a new law is adopted.

The council’s direction came after three hours of public comment.

—— Story by James R. Riffel of City News Service


  • nicole scott

    Wow, after sitting through the day at City Council, Marti Emerald and I both had our heads in our hands wondering what is going on. I want access to cannabis at a storefront dispensary in a safe area with fair prices and I believe the council would like to settle this ugly battle.
    As I see it, our biggest barrier is ourselves. This means how people present and speak to the members of city council. The fragmenting of agendas, the separate goals of these parties and how it looks to city council and the rest of the world. I know why we -the mmj community- can not agree but it is not great looking to those who are not part of this small group of activists.
    My hope is that these groups of people looking to have a ordinance is SD can come together to find common ground so we can all get what we want. Without a clear message all that is heard is yelling and confusion. Yep I want safe access and I want it now. California has laws that protect us and the city needs to have some too.

  • MarijuanaTech

    Safe and secure access is your right as a California resident with a proper Doctors recommendation. I do not understand San Diego powers that be at all. But still here to help Directors continue the good work they do with technology and the most powerful complete Medical Marijuana Dispensary Management solutions available. Let me know how I can help.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.