Gay couples want financial fairness

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SAN DIEGO — For many same-sex couples the current fight to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act isn’t just about having their relationship recognized by the federal government, it’s about money.

Screen Shot 2013-03-27 at 9.25.12 PMLike many other heterosexual married couples, Kevin Beiser and his life partner of eight years Dan Mock share a home and their finances, but every year come tax time, they’re reminded of where they stand in the eyes of Uncle Sam.

“It’s a process we have to go through every year and we do have that feeling of being second class citizens,” said Beiser. “We pay more on taxes than everybody else.”

The Defense of Marriage Act currently being debated in the US Supreme Court does not allow for domestic or life partners of the same sex, like Beiser and Mock, to file their taxes jointly as they are able to do in California under a state registered domestic partner law.

DOMA serves as a barrier for laws to be made at the federal level, that would allow couples like them access to federal benefits married heterosexual couples have, especially when it comes to taxes.

“It pays to be married,” said San Diego tax attorney Ronson J. Shamoun. “With the transfer of assets, inheritance and IRA’s that can be transferred tax free, there are a lot of financial benefits to being married.”

Under the current federal law, Beiser and Mock are forced to file their federal income taxes individually, which they say ends up costing more.

“$8,000 to $10,000 more in taxes, we’ve had to pay,” said Beiser, who’s serves as board member in the San Diego Unified School District.

His life partner, Mock works for Meteropolitan Transit System as a bus driver.

They said striking down DOMA wouldn’t only make things fair for them tax-wise; it would also help them plan for the future.

“Social security, survival benefits which we’re denied,” said the San Diego couple.

Both are also worried about their home, which they own.

“Instead of being able to inherit your partner’s half, you can’t do that, so you have to sell the house, so the money ends up going to the government,” said Beiser. “I just hope that the nine people that get to decide the fate of millions and millions of people in our country will decide on the right side of justice.”


  • guest

    These are the first gay people I've heard of that have been totally honest regarding same-sex marriage. It has nothing to do with love and is all about the money.

  • guest

    there are ways to not pay as much tax…you could rent to your partner and have rental deductions….you can hire your partner and deduct employee costs…etc etc….and you can always buy term insurance for survivor…just saying

  • Guest

    I'll never understand why this topic was ever debated. Seems immature to deny a productive member of society the recognition and benefits of having a spouse. When two people are legally forced to pay taxes(gay or not), they should also be legally allowed to marry and receive any benefits or consequences of that marriage(gay or not).

    In fact with the earth's population booming, pretty much out of control, I think it would be wise to promote homosexuality. Not gay, but it might help. :)

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.