The obvious exception was a $1.4 million cut to the City Attorney’s Office. The cut amounts to the loss of 13 positions the staff of City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, the mayor’s political rival. Filner said Goldsmith’s office had grown in personnel over the past five years while other departments lost workers.
“This is a couple percent, it’s not a major thing,” Filner said. “There’s vacancies in all departments, so I’m not sure it’s any problem. Under the terms, as I understand, of the (City) Charter, the attorney could adjust those savings in any way he wants, and he has said on a couple occasions, as long as you don’t tell me where I have to make the cuts, it’s fine.”
The City Attorney’s Office has not immediately responded to a request for comment.
The overall budget proposal is 0.1 percent smaller than the current fiscal year, which ends June 30. But general fund spending, which includes basic city services such as public safety and libraries, would be $1.2 billion, an increase of 3.1 percent.
The first budget proposal of the new mayor’s term will now go to the City Council for changes and adoption.
“This is a transition budget,” Filner told reporters.
He said he and his financial staff tried to squeeze his priorities — improving public safety and services in the city’s neighborhoods — into a budget scenario with pressures unforeseen before he took office.
“We balanced it in a way we thought was responsible,” Filner said.
He used $21.6 million of a settlement with San Diego Gas & Electric over the 2007 wildfires to patch some holes in the budget, and renewed his call for a five-year agreement with labor that he said would lower the city’s contributions to the employee retirement system.
The budget proposal would add the equivalent of almost 38 full-time jobs citywide.
Spending increases include $3.2 million for deferred capital operations and maintenance; $2.4 million to operate the soon-to-open Central Library; $1.6 million for supporting arts programs; $1.3 million for maintaining a homeless shelter; and $1.2 million for additional police recruits.
Spending reductions include saving $5.6 million by delaying debt service payments on a capital improvements bond until the following fiscal year; a $2.1 million contribution to a public liability fund that an actuarial study found to be unnecessary; and the cut previously mentioned to the City Attorney’s Office.